“True-Sales: The Quest Continues to Create a Doctrine to Guide Investors, Creditors and the Courts” published by The Journal of Corporate Renewal

Print PDF
October 2, 2018

Ever since the securitization market began its exponential growth three decades ago, scholars and lawyers involved in structured finance have searched for a secular “holy grail”—a clear legal definition of a true-sale.  The quest is an important one.  Despite its implosion in the aftermath of the financial crisis a decade ago, the securitization market in the U.S. remains massive and is now roaring back to growth.  Standard & Poor’s recently estimated that new private securitization issuances in the U.S. alone may reach $565 billion in 2018, a figure which represents an increase of more than 50 percent from just two years ago, and new private securitizations worldwide this year are expected to top $1 trillion.  Scholars and securitization participants have proposed a variety of analytical approaches to create a comprehensive true-sale doctrine.  However, courts continue to rely on a nonexclusive set of factors governed mostly by state law in making their true-sale decisions.

In this article, RK&O partner Christopher Andrew Jarvinen explores the continued vitality of the factors’ approach in determining whether a transaction represents a true-sale or a loan, and highlights some of the true-sale frameworks suggested by commentators.

Click here to read the full publication.